Since FY1977, only two continuing resolutions have reached a chamber's floor before September. Both of them passed this summer.

Congress usually waits until September to pass a continuing resolution. This year, both chambers acted before the August recess.

Party leaders dominate today’s Senate because rank-and-file senators increasingly defer to them - not because the chamber’s rules require it. Senators accepted less influence over legislation in exchange for a more predictable schedule, fewer difficult votes, and less responsibility for making the Senate work.

The Senate did not always rely on cloture, closed-door negotiations, and powerful party leaders to pass legislation. Committees developed bills, senators debated and amended them on the floor, and majority leaders managed the process without controlling it.

The Senate cannot determine what legislation will pass by counting cloture votes before debate begins. Floor debate reveals senators’ resolve, tests possible compromises, and produces the information needed to legislate.

The Senate’s impasse over the SAVE America Act shows that gridlock is caused less by the filibuster than by senators’ unwillingness to bear the costs of legislating. Republicans are not forcing Democrats to sustain their opposition, while Democrats are not required to obstruct—leaving bipartisan inaction to masquerade as minority veto.

Senators accept the closed cloture process because it makes their work predictable, convenient, and insulated from responsibility - even as it prevents them from debating legislation, offering amendments, and advancing their priorities. The Senate’s dysfunction therefore results not simply from its rules, but from rank-and-file senators choosing to surrender their power to party leaders.

The Senate has no single way of considering legislation. The Republican debate over the SAVE America Act reflects a larger choice among collegial, majoritarian, and structured-consent approaches to debate, amendments, and decision-making.